Rating: ****
The set-up is simple: five friends go out
to a remote cabin to enjoy some drinking, debauchery and other wholesome
activities. It’s the conceit that’s launched a million horror movies, and
director Drew Goddard and co-writer Joss Whedon know it. Five friends go out
into the woods, but not all of them are coming home, the question is who dies
first and how?
But wait, obviously it’s more complicated
than that. The key to The Cabin in the Woods is to go in as pure as
possible. After seeing the press screening, I watched the ads on TV and have
been kind of surprised by how much is hinted at, or outright given away. Needless
to say, there’s something more afoot to the story then friends in the woods being
pestered by some demonic undead redneck family. So what’s going on? Let’s just
say that there’s some people highly invested in watching these young folks die.
In the opening scenes, we meet our motley
crew. There’s alpha jock Curt (Chris Hemsworth), his girlfriend Jules (Anna
Hutchison), the slightly nerdish but still kind of hunky Holden (Jesse Williams),
the shy but pretty Dana (Kristen Connolly), and resident stoner Marty (Fran
Kranz). They load into a Winnebago and head for a road so far off the map it’s
not worthy of global positioning. When they get to the “rustic” cabin, they
notice a few oddities, like paintings of human sacrifice and how two of the
bedrooms are connected with one-way glass, but the latter discovery of a
basement filled with potential horrors and sideshow oddities seals their doom,
whatever doom they might choose.
Like Scream or New Nightmare before
it, The Cabin in the Woods seeks to turn the genre on its head. Although
that comparison leans more to the later than the former, as Scream had
fun turning the conventions on their head, while Cabin, like Nightmare,
dares to ponder where are horrors come from, and how we can beat them. It’s
not so much about young people dying in horrible ways, but the implications
there-in. The grander meaning. What is the communal experience of seeing a
horror movie all about? Is it about engaging our more primal instincts, and to
what degree?
Make no mistake, this is a horror movie for
horror movie fans, by horror movie fans, and because of that I’m not sure how
“commercial” Cabin will be. But having said that, this is a highly
impressive debut for Goddard, who’s cut his teeth as a writer studying under
two of the best mass-appeal nerdy filmmakers in the business: Whedon and J.J.
Abrams. As a script, this is right in Whedon’s ball park with lots of scares
and humour and Whedon-speak. Regular Whedon players like Kranz (Dollhouse),
Amy Acker (Angel) and Tom Lenk (Buffy) also have roles.
Most importantly though, the characters
feel very fleshed out. They’re living, breathing people, and that’s despite the
fact that they are built in archetypes filling a specific purpose in the
script. Some of that is owned by the actors. Pre-Thor Hemsworth shows
off a more laidback vibe complete with letterman’s jacket, and it suits him,
Kranz does stoner right and becomes the unlikely hero when another medical
benefit of pot is demonstrated, and the rest of the young cast, who are
unknowns for the most part, are likeable and engaging. But the real stars of
this film are Bradley Whitford and Richard Jenkins. Unlikely as it may be that
two guys over the age of 50 are the central figures in a youth-oriented horror
movie, they just may be the heart and soul of the story; a kind of Statler and
Waldorf offering commentary and context through the main story.
But if for no other reason, The Cabin in
the Woods is worth seeing because it provides a nice break from current
trends in horror cinema: it’s not a remake, it’s not a splatter-filled torture
porn, and there’s not a single instance of “found footage.” It’s solid
filmmaking. The cinematography is great, dark and moody when it needs to be,
but it can also be warm and fun. (Thankfully, someone smart along the way
decided that 3-D was not an option.) The creature effects are fantastic, the
script is great, and the cast is phenomenal. It’s a rewarding film, but again,
I think only a few will reap it to maximum effect.


No comments:
Post a Comment